Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/76706 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
1-Feb-2012
Citation: 
[Journal:] International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence [ISSN:] 2165-4069 [Volume:] 1 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] The Science and Information (SAI) Organization [Place:] New York [Year:] 2012-02-01 [Pages:] 32-38
Publisher: 
The Science and Information (SAI) Organization, New York
Abstract: 
The literature on the information society indicates that it is a still-developing field of research. It can be explained by the lack of consensus on basic definitions and research methods. There are also different judgments on the importance and the significance of the information society. Some social scientists write about a change of era, others emphasize parallelism with the past. There are some authors who expect that the information society will solve the problems of social inequalities, poverty and unemployment, while others blame it on the widening social gap between the information haves and have-nots. Various models of the information society have been developed so far and they are so different from country to country that it would be rather unwise to look for a single, all-encompassing definition. In our time a number of profound socio-economic changes are underway. Almost every field of our life is affected by the different phenomena of globalization, beside the growing role of the individual; another important characteristic of this process is the development of an organizing principle based on the free creation, distribution, access and use of knowledge and information. The 1990s and the 21st century is undoubtedly characterized by the world of the information society (as a form of the post-industrial society), which represents a different quality compared to the previous ones. The application of these theories and schools on ICT is problematic in many respects. First, as we stated above, there is not a single, widely used paradigm which has synthesized the various schools and theories dealing with technology and society. Second, these fragmented approaches do not have a fully-fledged mode of application to the relationship of ICT and (information) society. Third, SCOT, ANT, the evolutionary- or the systems approach to the history of technology – when dealing with information society – does not take into account the results of approaches (such as information science or information systems literature or social informatics, information management and knowledge management, communication and media studies) studying the very essence of the information age: information, communication and knowledge. The list of unnoticed or partially incorporated sciences, which focuses on the role of ICT in human information processing and other cognitive activities, is much longer.
Subjects: 
Information society
Social Construction of Technology
Actor-Network-Theory
JEL: 
M13
M15
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:






Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.