Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/70040 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe No. 229
Publisher: 
Universität Augsburg, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Augsburg
Abstract: 
Wer nur an die Marktwirtschaft glaubt, ist abergläubisch, stellte der katholische Theologe Hans Küng vor einigen Jahren in einem Beitrag „Ökonomie und Theologie“ für Studenten der Wirtschaftswissenschaften fest. Soziale Marktwirtschaft, so ließe sich fortfahren, schützt vor diesem Aberglauben. Aber Wirtschaftstheorie und Wirtschaftsethik beweisen heute, dass Marktwirtschaft als Institution schon an sich sozial und ethisch ist. Genau das Gegenteil war Ausgangspunkt der Idee der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Überlegungen zur Notwendigkeit einer „neuen Sozialen Marktwirtschaft“ müssen deshalb mit der Erinnerung an die ursprüngliche Idee der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft beginnen (Teil 1), ihre Ausgestaltung durch Wirtschaftspolitik verfolgen (Teile 2-4). Nicht einmal die große Herausforderung durch die Überleitung der ehemaligen DDR in die marktwirtschaftliche Ordnung ließ die Forderung nach einer „neuen Sozialen Marktwirtschaft“ laut werden (Teil 5). Dasselbe gilt für die seit Jahren steigende Arbeitslosigkeit, deren Beseitigung alle Parteien und alle Regierungen höchste Priorität einräumen. Bei den bisherigen Misserfolgen drängt sich der Verdacht auf, dass die Lösungen aus dem marktwirtschaftlichen Denkmodell gerade wegen der Globalisierung in eine Sackgasse geraten (Teil 6). Was sollte somit jetzt eine „neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft“ notwendig machen (Teil 7)? Die Analyse zeigt, dass die Verteidigung der „alten Sozialen Marktwirtschaft“ im unterstellten stürmischen Globalisierungsprozess die bedeutendste Herausforderung darstellt – für die Wirtschaft und für die Gesellschaft (Teil 8).
Abstract (Translated): 
The German economic miracle” after the second world war is connected with the design of an economic policy labeled Social Market Economy which forms a third path between capitalism (pure or free market economy) and socialism (centrally planned economy). This notion is relevant for New Labor in Britain as well as for the Social Democrats in Germany. Social Market Economy is usually perceived as an idea aimed at reaching social justice and national peace and thus avoiding the traditional class struggle between capital and labor. However, this idea also requires a change in the paradigm of economic thinking from traditional self-organization by markets to a mixture of social control of both government and markets. Until now, however, economic theory has refused to follow this new paradigm, thus resulting in a deficiency of theory in the field of Social Market Economy. Microeconomic theory is dominating the current economic thinking. The realization of a socially responsible market economy” should be done pragmatically by political recognition of changing challenges and situations, thus establishing the welfare state in democratic decisions. History has shown that governments have often alternated between the right wing and the left wing. During the sixties, the Social Democrats retained the well established concepts of a Social Market Economy, but attempted to design a left wing” version thereof, aimed at more political control. In Germany, suffering from the first great crisis in the Federal Republic, this was done in order to reach a higher degree of economic stability. The ensuing governments, led by the Christian Democrats in Germany, attempted to reduce the welfare state using the slogan more market, less state”. Not even the great challenge of transforming the former socialist parts of Germany into a market economy gave rise to the idea of a new Social Market Economy”. Similarly, it is argued in this paper that there is no need for a new Social Market Economy”: The old one is open for reforms from the left as well as from the right wing as experience over more than 50 years has demonstrated. The original Social Market Economy is worth being defended even in view of globalization and is recommended for many economies all over the world in order to avoid globalization of the traditional class struggle” between capital and labor. A necessary condition for any socially controlled market economy” are properly working political institutions and governments. Therefore, in order to ensure the necessary public interventions, national states must not vanish, as prophets of globalization often maintain. On the contrary, a political countervailing power is necessary to discipline the global economic players” as well as to avoid political hegemony of one or more national states. In a global world, only the national states can guarantee decisions along the so called subsidiary principle” of Social Market Economy.
Subjects: 
reine Marktwirtschaft
Soziale Marktwirtschaft
Paradigmenwechsel
dritter Weg
dialektischer Prozess
Wohlfahrtsstaat
Subsidiaritaetsprinzip
JEL: 
A0
L0
P0
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
232.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.