Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/65940
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLynn, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorKaminska, Olenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Harveyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-06T14:52:16Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-06T14:52:16Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/65940-
dc.description.abstractWe assess whether the probability of a sample member participating at a particular wave of a panel survey is greater if the same interviewer is deployed as at the previous wave. Previous research on this topic mainly uses non-experimental data. Consequently, a) interviewer change is generally non-random, and b) continuing interviewers are more experienced by the time of the next wave. We designed a balanced experiment in which both interviewer continuity and experience are controlled. Multilevel multiple membership models are used to explore the effects of interviewer continuity on refusal rate and response rate as well as interactions of interviewer continuity with other variables.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aISER |cColchesteren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aISER Working Paper Series |x2011-02en_US
dc.subject.jelC81en_US
dc.subject.jelC83en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordlongitudinal surveyen_US
dc.subject.keywordmultiple membership multi-level modelen_US
dc.subject.keywordnon-responseen_US
dc.subject.keywordrefusalen_US
dc.subject.stwMeinungsforschungen_US
dc.subject.stwBefragungen_US
dc.subject.stwPanelen_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titlePanel attrition: How important is it to keep the same interviewer?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn655002685en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
235.89 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.