EconStor >
The University of Nottingham >
Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade (CREDIT), The University of Nottingham >
CREDIT Research Papers, The University of Nottingham >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/65481
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeyaro, Vincenten_US
dc.contributor.authorMorrissey, Oliveren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-04en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-24T12:02:43Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-24T12:02:43Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/65481-
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the association between household characteristics' in particular size and location, and for the household head age, sector of employment (and the tariff applicable to that sector) and education - and household income using data from the Tanzania Household Budget Survey for the years 1991/92, 2000/01 and 2007. The static analysis of the determinants of household income is based on the full sample and is complemented by a dynamic analysis using a pseudo-panel (representative households). Larger households have lower income; living in urban areas is associated with income around one quarter higher than rural households; and location in the Coastal zone, which includes Dar es Salaam, increases household income by about 15% compared to the poorest region (Central). Years of education of the household head is associated with higher income: each additional year of education adds about 4.5%. Average incomes of agriculture households are lower than for manufacturing households, but within each broad sector incomes appear to be higher in sub-sectors with higher tariffs. Household income tends to increase in both tariffs and education, but the effect of tariffs diminishes or becomes negative for household heads with secondary education and alters over time. Observing that tariffs offer less protection to the incomes of more educated workers compared to less educated (less skilled) workers is consistent with better educated workers being more productive and therefore in firms, or sectors, better able to compete with imports. Given data limitations it would be incorrect to infer a causal effect of tariffs on household incomes. Nevertheless, the analysis is informative about the effect of the cross-sector pattern of tariff protection on household incomes allowing for other determinants.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCentre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, Univ. of Nottingham Nottinghamen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCREDIT Research Paper 10/03en_US
dc.subject.jelD10en_US
dc.subject.jelH31en_US
dc.subject.jelO55en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordHousehold Incomeen_US
dc.subject.keywordSector Tariffsen_US
dc.subject.keywordEducationen_US
dc.subject.keywordTanzaniaen_US
dc.subject.stwPrivater Haushalten_US
dc.subject.stwHaushaltseinkommenen_US
dc.subject.stwBallungsraumen_US
dc.subject.stwLändlicher Raumen_US
dc.subject.stwBildungsverhaltenen_US
dc.subject.stwTansaniaen_US
dc.titleProtection and the determinants of household income in Tanzania 1991-2007en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn655556281en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:CREDIT Research Papers, The University of Nottingham

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
655556281.pdf308.99 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.