|
EconStor >
ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München >
CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/65380
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Barbosa, Klenio | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Boyer, Pierre C. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-10-17 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-10-19T15:42:28Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2012-10-19T15:42:28Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2012 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/65380 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | Discriminatory programs that favor local and small firms in government procurement are common in many countries. This paper studies the long-run impact of procurement discrimination on market structure and future competition in industries where learning-by-doing makes incumbent firms more efficient over time. We consider a sequential procurement design problem in which local and global firms compete for public good provision. Both firms benefit from learning-by-doing if they provide the public good in the previous period but global firms only may be able to transfer learning-by-doing from different markets. We find that the optimal procurement has to be biased in favor of the local firm even when all firms are symmetric with respect to their initial cost distribution. This bias fosters future competition and reduces intertemporal expected transfers to providers. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | CESifo München | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | CESifo Working Paper: Public Finance 3947 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D44 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | H57 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | H70 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | H87 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | discrimination | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | dynamic procurement | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | local versus global firms | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | learning-by-doing | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Öffentliche Beschaffung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Diskriminierung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | KMU | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Großunternehmen | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Herkunftsbezeichnung | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Multinationales Unternehmen | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Lernprozess | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Wettbewerb | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Dynamisches Modell | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Theorie | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Discrimination in dynamic procurement design with learning-by-doing | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 727653679 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | | CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|