EconStor >
University of Essex >
Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex >
EUROMOD Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64903
  
Title:Automatic stabilisers and economic crisis: US vs Europe PDF Logo
Authors:Dolls, Mathias
Fuest, Clemens
Peichl, Andreas
Issue Date:2010
Series/Report no.:EUROMOD Working Paper EM2/10
Abstract:This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the tax and transfer systems in the European Union and the US to act as an automatic stabilizer in the current economic crisis. We find that automatic stabilizers absorb 38 per cent of a proportional income shock in the EU, compared to 32 per cent in the US. In the case of an unemployment shock 47 per cent of the shock are absorbed in the EU, compared to 34 per cent in the US. This cushioning of disposable income leads to a demand stabilization of up to 31 per cent in the EU and up to 28 per cent in the US. There is large heterogeneity within the EU. Automatic stabilizers in Eastern and Southern Europe are much lower than in Central and Northern European countries. We also investigate whether countries with weak automatic stabilizers have enacted larger fiscal stimulus programs. We find no evidence supporting this view.
Subjects:automatic stabilization
crisis
liquidity constraints
fiscal stimulus
JEL:E32
E63
H2
H31
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:EUROMOD Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
632177853.pdf431.26 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64903

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.