EconStor >
University of Essex >
Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex >
EUROMOD Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64875
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalanauskaitÄ—, Linaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVerbist, Gerlindeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-31en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-15T14:12:41Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-15T14:12:41Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64875-
dc.description.abstractTo what extent can a country's effectiveness in reducing child poverty be attributed to the size of family cash transfers (i.e. both benefits and tax advantages) or to their design? In this paper, we disentangle the importance of each of these two factors, focusing on the family support system in Lithuania and comparing it with four other new member states. Both single and large families have increased susceptibility to poverty in Lithuania. This contrasts with other former communist countries, namely Estonia, Hungary, Slovenia and the Czech Republic which protect these family types much better. This paper examines whether their family transfer systems would achieve similar results in Lithuania. We employ the EUROMOD microsimulation tax-benefit model to swap family policies across countries and to test whether size or design has greater effects on child poverty reduction in Lithuania. Our results point to considerably improving poverty situation among large families under Hungarian, Slovenian and the Czech policies. Single parent families would only gain if Lithuanian spending on family transfers would increase by a large degree. Estonian policies would lead to very mixed results: small gains for large families and losses for single parent families.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv. of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research Colchesteren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUROMOD Working Paper EM4/11en_US
dc.subject.jelC81en_US
dc.subject.jelI32en_US
dc.subject.jelI38en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordchild povertyen_US
dc.subject.keywordfamily benefits and tax advantagesen_US
dc.subject.keywordmicrosimulationen_US
dc.subject.keywordnew EU member statesen_US
dc.titleIs the "neighbour's" lawn greener? Comparing family support in Lithuania and four other NMSen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn684423316en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:EUROMOD Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
684423316.pdf570.22 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.