EconStor >
University of Essex >
Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex >
EUROMOD Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64872
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCallan, Timen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeventi, Chrysaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Horacioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatsaganis, Manosen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaulus, Alarien_US
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Hollyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-02en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-15T14:12:36Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-15T14:12:36Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64872-
dc.description.abstractWe compare the distributional effects of austerity measures that have been introduced in 6 EU countries in the period of large government budget deficits following the 2007-8 financial crisis and subsequent economic downturn. We explore the effects of policy changes presented as austerity measures in Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Portugal and the UK, using the EU microsimulation model EUROMOD and the Irish national model, SWITCH. The six countries have chosen different policy mixes to achieve varying degrees of fiscal consolidation. We focus on the first round effects of increases in personal taxes, cuts in spending on cash benefits and reductions in public sector pay across the distributions of household income. There is a range of important conceptual and consistency issues to be addressed when doing such analysis, particularly in a comparative setting. These include how to identify austerity measures in a consistent manner, the relevant time periods to consider, the assumptions behind the counterfactual scenarios and the scope of the policies considered. Using a set of common assumptions we find that the burden of fiscal consolidation brought about through changes in components of household disposable income is shared differently across the income distribution in the six countries. At one extreme, in Greece, the better off lose a higher proportion of their incomes than the poor and at the other, in Portugal, the poor lose a higher proportion than the rich. Bringing increases in indirect taxes into the picture can alter conclusions about the overall distributional effect, increasing the cost most for those with lower income and making the overall incidence of the measures more regressive.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv. of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research Colchesteren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUROMOD Working Paper EM6/11en_US
dc.subject.jelC81en_US
dc.subject.jelH55en_US
dc.subject.jelI3en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordAusterity measuresen_US
dc.subject.keywordEuropean Unionen_US
dc.subject.keywordFiscal consolidationen_US
dc.subject.keywordPovertyen_US
dc.subject.keywordMicrosimulationen_US
dc.titleThe distributional effects of austerity measures: A comparison of six EU countriesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn684653427en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:EUROMOD Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
684653427.pdf657.27 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.