EconStor >
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf >
Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), University of Düsseldorf >
DICE Discussion Paper, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64807
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRegner, Tobiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorRiener, Gerharden_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-11T11:27:16Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-11T11:27:16Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-86304-067-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64807-
dc.description.abstractWe construct a simple three person trust game with one trustor and two trustees. The trustor has the possibility to either trust both trustees or none, while the trustees make their decisions either sequentially or simultaneously, depending on the treatment. When trustees play sequentially, follower trustees who are informed about the leader's choice are significantly more selfish than in the simultaneous move treatment, independent of the leader's choice. Leaders do not behave significantly different than in the baseline treatment. Follower trustees cherry pick the motivation that materially serves them best. When the leader trustee plays selfish, they tend to conform. When the leader makes a pro-social choice, followers seem to perceive the duty as already fulfilled by the leader. While guilt works well as a motivational force in a dyadic situation, it gets alleviated easily when the situation allows a shifting of responsibility.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDICE Düsseldorfen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDICE Discussion Paper 68en_US
dc.subject.jelD03en_US
dc.subject.jelD71en_US
dc.subject.jelC79en_US
dc.subject.jelC92en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordTeam productionen_US
dc.subject.keywordTrusten_US
dc.subject.keywordChoice architectureen_US
dc.subject.keywordGuilt aversionen_US
dc.subject.keywordConformityen_US
dc.subject.keywordFalse consensus effecten_US
dc.subject.keywordLab experimenten_US
dc.subject.keywordCherry pickingen_US
dc.titleMotivational cherry pickingen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn727137433en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:dicedp:68-
Appears in Collections:DICE Discussion Paper, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
727137433.pdf371.21 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.