EconStor >
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ), Leipzig >
UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64556
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPurkus, Alexandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGawel, Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorThrän, Danielaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-11en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-01T08:32:31Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-01T08:32:31Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64556-
dc.description.abstractBioenergy can play an important part in managing the transition towards a lowcarbon energy system. However, in many countries its rapid expansion increases pressures on agricultural land use and natural ecosystems, resulting in conflicts with conservation aims and food security. Establishing an effective governance framework for bioenergy, to safeguard against sustainability risks and promote the efficient use of scarce biomass resources, is of the utmost importance, but is complicated by the existence of multiple objectives, multiple market failures and the variety of possible value chains. In this situation, policy recommendations based on neoclassical assumptions prove too abstract to be of practical relevance. Using the case of European bioenergy policy, this paper explores how economic bioenergy policy recommendations could be improved by using a new institutional economics (NIE) perspective. Moving along the value chain, we discuss what implications the consideration of transaction costs, incomplete information, path dependencies, and political feasibility has for finding solutions to the governance challenges of bioenergy. We conclude that policy implications derived from NIE differ clearly both from neoclassical recommendations and current EU bioenergy policy, and that a NIE framework for the analysis of bioenergy governance, which takes not only market failures, but also the risks of government failures into account, could make a useful contribution to the development of realistic, second-best solutions to the allocative problems of bioenergy use.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUFZ Leipzigen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUFZ-Diskussionspapiere 13/2012en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordbioenergy policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordrenewable energy policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordclimate change mitigationen_US
dc.subject.keywordnew institutional economicsen_US
dc.titleBioenergy governance between market and government failures: A new institutional economics perspectiveen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn725337559en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ufzdps:132012-
Appears in Collections:UFZ-Diskussionspapiere, Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung (UFZ)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
725337559.pdf515.66 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.