EconStor >
W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Mich. >
Upjohn Institute Working Papers, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64374
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKleykamp, Meredith A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-08en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-26T12:55:56Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-26T12:55:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64374-
dc.description.abstractIn the more than 30 years following the all-volunteer force (AVF), the proportion of women serving in the military has increased from 1.8 percent just before the AVF to 14.2 percent in 2008. The majority of women do not stay in the military for a 20-year or longer career; like men, most women only serve a few years before transitioning to the civilian workforce. Although the fraction of the military who are women has risen, as has the fraction of veterans who are women, little research informs how female veterans of the AVF fare economically after leaving service, or whether military service benefits minority women who serve in such disproportionate numbers. This paper investigates the civilian employment experiences of female veterans of the AVF using two sources of data. First, population-based data from the American Community Survey are used to evaluate the employment experiences of female veterans. Second, data from an audit study of civilian hiring practices provides additional insight into the experiences of women veterans transitioning from military to civilian work. We find little evidence of a veteran labor market disadvantage, either for white or black women. Both groups exhibit strong patterns of labor force attachment. Only white women show slightly lower rates of employment (among those in the labor force), while black women veterans show consistently advantageous employment profiles. These positive employment outcomes among female veterans at least partly derive from employer preference for hiring veterans over equally qualified nonveteran women.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW.E. Upjohn Inst. for Employment Research Kalamazoo, Mich.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUpjohn Institute Working Paper 10-169en_US
dc.subject.jelJ01en_US
dc.subject.jelJ24en_US
dc.subject.jelJ70en_US
dc.subject.jelZ13en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordField Experimentsen_US
dc.subject.keywordVeteransen_US
dc.subject.keywordDiscriminationen_US
dc.subject.keywordHiringen_US
dc.subject.keywordEmploymenten_US
dc.subject.stwSoldatenen_US
dc.subject.stwWeibliche Arbeitskräfteen_US
dc.subject.stwBeschäftigungen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsmarktdiskriminierungen_US
dc.subject.stwUSAen_US
dc.titleWomen's work after waren_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn63865937Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Upjohn Institute Working Papers, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
63865937X.pdf211.54 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.