EconStor >
W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Mich. >
Upjohn Institute Working Papers, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64340
  
Title:"Mass privatisation and the post-communist mortality crisis": Is there really a relationship? PDF Logo
Authors:Earle, John S.
Gehlbach, Scott
Issue Date:2010
Series/Report no.:Upjohn Institute Working Paper 10-162
Abstract:We reexamine the recent, well-publicized claim that 'rapid mass privatisation [of state-owned enterprises] ... was a crucial determinant of differences in adult mortality trends in postcommunist countries' (Stuckler, King and McKee, 2009). Our analysis shows that the estimated correlation of privatization and mortality in country-level data is not robust to recomputing the mass-privatization measure, to assuming a short lag for economic policies to affect mortality, and to controlling for country-specific mortality trends. Further, in an analysis of the determinants of mortality in Russian regions, we find no evidence that privatization increased mortality during the early 1990s. Finally, we reanalyze the relationship between privatization and unemployment in postcommunist countries, showing that there is little support for the proposed mechanism by which privatization might have increased mortality.
Subjects:privatization
mortality
health
shock therapy
unemployment
Eastern Europe
Former Soviet Union
Lancet
JEL:I18
L33
P2
P31
O57
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Upjohn Institute Working Papers, W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
624959473.pdf817.3 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64340

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.