|
EconStor >
University of Massachusetts (UMass Amherst) >
Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64227
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Skott, Peter | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2011-11-11 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-09-25T07:19:23Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2012-09-25T07:19:23Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2011 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64227 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | This note outlines and discusses some of the strands in the post-Keynesian literature on business cycles. Most post-Keynesians have focused on endogenously generated cycles, but the mechanism varies: some focus on the goods market, others on financial markets, the labor market, or political intervention. The merits of formal modeling of the cycles have also come in for debate. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Univ. of Massachusetts, Dep. of Economics Amherst, Mass. | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Working Paper, University of Massachusetts, Department of Economics 2011-21 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Business cycles | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 672002558 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | | Working Papers, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|