EconStor >
University of Massachusetts (UMass Amherst) >
Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/64227
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSkott, Peteren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-11en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-25T07:19:23Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-25T07:19:23Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/64227-
dc.description.abstractThis note outlines and discusses some of the strands in the post-Keynesian literature on business cycles. Most post-Keynesians have focused on endogenously generated cycles, but the mechanism varies: some focus on the goods market, others on financial markets, the labor market, or political intervention. The merits of formal modeling of the cycles have also come in for debate.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv. of Massachusetts, Dep. of Economics Amherst, Mass.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper, University of Massachusetts, Department of Economics 2011-21en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleBusiness cyclesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn672002558en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
672002558.pdf87.25 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.