EconStor >
Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), Helsinki >
ETLA Discussion Papers, Research Institute of the Finnish Economy >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63983
  
Title:When does distributed innovation activity make sense? Location, decentralization, and innovation success PDF Logo
Authors:Leiponen, Aija
Helfat, Constance E.
Issue Date:2006
Series/Report no.:ETLA Discussion Papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA) 1063
Abstract:Companies face an expanding set of choices about where to locate their innovation activity, both within their home countries and abroad. This location choice also requires firms to make a simultaneous choice about the organizational structure of innovation activity: almost by definition, multiple locations per firm imply some degree of decentralization. Using firm-level data on innovation output and the location of research and development (R&D) activity, we shed new light on the question of whether firms that have multiple locations also have greater innovation success. Our results indicate that, on average, having distributed R&D activity is beneficial in terms of the extent and breadth of innovation success, and the effect is strongly related to the knowledge sourcing strategies that firms employ. These results are consistent with the interpretation that R&D location decisions are driven by the desire of firms to access a broad set of external sources of knowledge for innovation activities. We also find that the benefits of multiple R&D locations do not apply to novel (new-to-the-market) innovations. Our results suggest that when analyzing technological innovation, it is important to distinguish between novel and imitative innovations, since their determinants may differ.
Subjects:R&D, innovation, organizational decentralization, knowledge sourcing
JEL:O32
L22
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:ETLA Discussion Papers, Research Institute of the Finnish Economy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
521502241.pdf146.13 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63983

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.