Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63781 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
ETLA Discussion Papers No. 1121
Publisher: 
The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), Helsinki
Abstract: 
This paper presents the first empirical evidence on the nature and effects of human resource practices (HRM) in the Finnish manufacturing sector. In the analysis, we use the novel survey on HRM practices, based on a representative random sample from the population of the Finnish manufacturing firms who had 50 or more employees in 2005. In the sample, we have firm-level information on several HRM and employee participation practices of 398 firms, which is 38% of the firms in the population and almost 50% of the survey respondents. To study how HRM practices affect the level of firm productivity, we first combined the HRM survey data with financial statement data and then estimated crosssectional and panel data estimators for the Cobb-Douglas production functions. We find that both the incidence of employee participation practices and the incidence of HRM tools have increased in the manufacturing sector from 2002 to 2005. The empirical findings support the view of a positive association with the HRM practices and the level of firm productivity. Perhaps more importantly, however, we find that not all forms of employee financial and decision-making participation practices have favorable productivity effects: consultative committee and profit sharing scheme has a positive effect, but other practices do not have statistically significant effects.
Subjects: 
new workplace practices
HRM
employee participation
productivity
JEL: 
M54
J53
L23
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
130.46 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.