EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Research Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63544
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Matthewen_US
dc.contributor.authorFry, Timen_US
dc.contributor.authorMihajilo, Sandraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-21T09:45:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-21T09:45:53Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9291909572=978-92-9190-957-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/63544-
dc.description.abstractAid is an important resource for developing countries. Many small island states (including those in the Pacific) are highly reliant on aid to supplement meagre government resources and other foreign capital inflows. This paper investigates the conditional volatility of aid (for bilateral aid disaggregated into sector aid and programme aid, and multilateral aid) to small island states using an econometric framework. In addition, year-on-year changes in aid allocation are also considered for both changes in aid allocations from major donors to the Pacific as well as for changes in aid receipts in 16 Pacific island countries. The entire sample of countries under consideration includes 44 aid-receiving (small island) states from the regions of Asia-Pacific, Africa and the Americas over the period 1973 to 2004. This paper finds that past aid flows are correlated with present aid flows and that volatility on both sector and programme aid in the Americas and Asia-Pacific region are characterized by a higher degree of volatility than in the African region. An important result of the analysis is that shocks to bilateral aid result in the persistence of volatility for a number of years before stabilizing. This evidence of persistence in volatility, whereby the past levels of volatility influence the degree of volatility that can be expected in the future, implies a certain degree of predictability in the conditional volatility of bilateral aid. The paper also finds that on average multilateral aid is not only considerably more volatile than the bilateral aid, but it is also more unpredictable.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNU-WIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU) 2007/18en_US
dc.subject.jelF35en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordaid volatilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsmall island statesen_US
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungshilfekonditionenen_US
dc.subject.stwInselen_US
dc.subject.stwKleines-Land-Modellen_US
dc.subject.stwPazifischer Raumen_US
dc.titleAid allocation volatility to small island statesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn537398562en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Research Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
537398562.pdf290.88 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.