Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63362 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2006
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
WIDER Research Paper No. 2006/97
Verlag: 
The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki
Zusammenfassung: 
It is often argued that an important reason why globalization may lead to GDP growth but fail to reduce poverty is because the poor are unable to participate in the new market opportunities and are marginalized. In this paper we examine the experience of resource-poor farmers in south India, who participated aggressively in the new market opportunities that opened up with trade reforms. However, these expanded market opportunities failed to improve their welfare. The paper examines why and how this happened. As cotton prices increased sharply following the reforms, a number of poor farmers shifted to cotton cultivation. However, cotton cultivation requires much greater technical expertise, working capital, and marketing network than the traditional crops. Interestingly, as state support declined, the network of private traders rapidly expanded to meet not only the marketing needs of the new crops but also to provide working capital and technical expertise. We show how this expanded, and largely unregulated, operation of private traders in multiple markets also provided them with the opportunity to extract greater surplus from the farmers. Thus, while increased participation in external markets exposed farmers to greater price risks and fraudulent dealings by the private traders, the shrinking role of the state reduced the farmers’ ability to cope with these risks. The result was a decline in average incomes of the resource-poor farmers and rising levels of indebtedness, as costs of production grew sharply. – globalization ; poverty ; agriculture ; contracts ; India
JEL: 
I31
O13
O24
ISBN: 
9291908770
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
157.13 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.