Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63353
Authors: 
Bowman, Chakriya
Chand, Satish
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
Research Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU) 2007/25
Abstract: 
This paper proposes that aid flowing to smaller (less populous) countries has a negative impact on the quality of institutions in terms of performance and policy as opposed to that flowing to larger countries, where evidence suggests that the impacts are positive. The analysis here suggests that the level of development, the size of an economy, and the level of aid receipts matter for institutional performance as quantified by measures of economic freedom. Cross-country evidence is presented that suggests the impact of aid is damaging in small vis-à-vis large countries, and that, while aid increases economic freedom as a whole, the impact of aid on economic freedom is negative for nations with a population less than 1.4 million. This is significant for small island economies in the Pacific, where increasing amounts of overseas development assistance fund governance programmes. Case studies of Fijian economic governance initiatives are used to illustrate the difficulties encountered when donors fund institutional reform programmes in Pacific states.
Subjects: 
Pacific islands
aid
growth
economic freedom index
institutions
JEL: 
F35
F4
O11
O19
ISBN: 
9291909645=978-92-9190-964-3
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
229.07 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.