EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Research Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63269
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSzent-Iványi, Balázsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-21T09:19:42Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-21T09:19:42Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.isbn929190970X=978-92-9190-970-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/63269-
dc.description.abstractOver the past few years addressing state fragility in the third world has become an important priority in international development cooperation. However, it seems that the international donor community has so far not been able to develop adequate instruments for dealing with the problems posed by state failure. We see two reasons for this: (i) there is growing recognition within the donor community that the lack of absorptive capacity, or bad economic policies in the partner country can actually make aid counterproductive, even harmful; and (ii) it is very difficult to manage effective development cooperation with weak governments. Channelling aid through NGOs, or giving limited aid in the form of capacity-building is clearly not sufficient to solve the problems fragile states face. In order to minimize distortions caused by aid, the literature advocates a policy-based selective approach, i.e., limiting aid funds to recipients with ‘good policies’. However, failed states (and many weak states for that matter) do not have the capability to formulate good economic policies, and some countries face serious challenges in meeting the criteria of good policies posed by the World Bank/IDA or the US in its Millennium Challenge Account. An important reason for this is that reforms within recipient countries aimed at forming good policies (especially liberalizing international trade, curbing inflation and cutting the budget deficit) create winners and losers, and the losers in fragile states can be strong enough to block policy changes or even cause conflict. We conclude that in order to better help weak states, the criteria for good policies must also include criteria for forming policies that compensate losers. Donors must help recipients in formulating such policies. To further ensure that losers of policy reforms do not block change, donors must pay greater attention to conflict prevention and social mediation in weak states, and to conflict management and peacebuilding in the case of failed states.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNU-WIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU) 2007/29en_US
dc.subject.jelO19en_US
dc.subject.jelF59en_US
dc.subject.jelF42en_US
dc.subject.jelO23en_US
dc.subject.jelO57en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keyworddevelopment cooperationen_US
dc.subject.keywordaiden_US
dc.subject.keywordfailed statesen_US
dc.subject.keywordstate failureen_US
dc.subject.keywordabsorptive capacityen_US
dc.subject.keywordDutch diseaseen_US
dc.subject.keywordselectivityen_US
dc.subject.keywordgood policiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordMillennium Challenge Accounten_US
dc.subject.stwStaatsversagenen_US
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungskooperationen_US
dc.titleState fragility and international development cooperationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn53739009Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Research Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
53739009X.pdf171.73 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.