EconStor >
United Nations University (UNU) >
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nations University >
WIDER Research Papers, United Nations University (UNU) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63241
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Justin Yifuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Peilinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-21T09:19:00Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-21T09:19:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9291908118en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/63241-
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that both openness and poverty in a country are endogenously determined by the country’s long-term economic development strategy. Development strategies can be broadly divided into two mutually exclusive groups: (i) the comparative advantage-defying (CAD) strategy, which attempts to encourage firms to deviate from the economy’s existing comparative advantages in their entry into an industry or choice of technology; and (ii) the comparative advantage-following (CAF) strategy, which attempts to facilitate the firms’ entry into an industry or choice of technology according to the economy’s existing comparative advantages. To carry out a CAD strategy, many governments of LDCs subsidize the firms in priority sectors by distorting capital prices, foreign exchange, and other inputs; and use administrative methods to allocate price-distorted inputs to the firms. The functions of market will be suppressed. Rent-seeking will be widespread. As a result, economic performance will be poor and the income distribution issue will worsen. Foreign trade will also be retarded. Only if governments of less-developed countries make following their economy’s comparative advantage the basic principle for promoting the economy’s industrial development, will the economy have an open and well functioning market, maintain a high rate of capital accumulation, upgrade its endowment structure quickly, and see a more equitable distribution of income and fewer poor.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUNU-WIDER Helsinkien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU) 2006/43en_US
dc.subject.jelO14en_US
dc.subject.jelO20en_US
dc.subject.jelO33en_US
dc.subject.jelN65en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordeconomic development strategyen_US
dc.subject.keywordincome distributionen_US
dc.subject.keywordglobalizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordpovertyen_US
dc.subject.stwEntwicklungsstrategieen_US
dc.subject.stwArmuten_US
dc.subject.stwGlobalisierungen_US
dc.subject.stwChinaen_US
dc.titleEconomic development strategy, openness and rural poverty: A framework and China's experiencesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn513085459en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:WIDER Research Papers, United Nations University (UNU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
513085459.pdf367.08 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.