Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63151 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMehlum, Halvoren
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T13:15:59Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T13:15:59Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/63151-
dc.description.abstractIn this note I bring a new aspect into the so called Island Problem. Given that only cases where there is a suspect reaches the court, what is the consequence for the probability of guilt? I find that it indeed matters for the results that court cases are selected in this way. The analysis illustrates the general point that the exact protocol by which data are generated is an essential part of the information that should be used when analyzing data.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aUniversity of Oslo, Department of Economics |cOsloen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aMemorandum |x2003,30en
dc.subject.jelC11en
dc.subject.jelen
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordBayesian analysisen
dc.subject.keywordForensic statisticsen
dc.subject.stwStichprobenverfahrenen
dc.subject.stwSchätztheorieen
dc.titleA finer point in forensic identification-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn373611676en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.