EconStor >
University of Oslo >
Department of Economics, University of Oslo >
Memorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63097
  
Title:Prioritizing public health expenditures when there is a private alternative PDF Logo
Authors:Hoel, Michael
Issue Date:2005
Series/Report no.:Memorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo 2005,16
Abstract:Cost-effectiveness analysis often plays an important role in prioritization among different types of public health expenditures. Cost-effectiveness is defined as the maximal health benefits for given expenditures on health care. With a private health sector as a supplement to the public sector, the socially optimal ranking of treatments to be included in the public health program is changed. The larger are the costs per treatment for a given benefit-cost ratio, the higher priority should the treatment be given. The more heterogeneous preferences for a particular treatment are, the lower priority should this treatment be given. If the health budget does not exceed the socially optimal size, treatments with sufficiently low costs should not be performed by the public health system if there is a private alternative.
Subjects:public health
prioritization
cost-effectiveness analysis
JEL:H42
H51
I10
I18
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Memorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
487853032.pdf175.93 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63097

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.