Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/63028 
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
Memorandum No. 2003,22
Publisher: 
University of Oslo, Department of Economics, Oslo
Abstract: 
We study climate policy when there are technological spillovers between countries, and there is no instrument that (directly) corrects for these externalities. Without an international climate agreement, the (non-cooperative) equilibrium depends on whether countries use tradable quotas or carbon taxes as their environmental policy instruments. All countries are better off in the tax case than in the quota case. Two types of international climate agreements are then studied: One is a Kyoto type of agreement where each country is assigned a specific number of internationally tradable quotas. In the second type of agreement a common carbon tax is used domestically in all countries. None of the cases satisfy the conditions for the social optimum. Even if the quota price is equal to the Pigovian level, R&D investments will be lower than what is socially optimal in the Kyoto case. It is also argued that the quota agreement gives higher R&D expenditures and more abatement than the tax agreement.
Subjects: 
Climate policy
international environmental agreements
R&D
technology spillovers
JEL: 
H23
O30
Q20
Q28
Q48
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
403.89 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.