Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62967
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAaberge, Rolfen_US
dc.contributor.authorColombino, Ugoen_US
dc.contributor.authorStrøm, Steinaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T13:10:47Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T13:10:47Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/62967-
dc.description.abstractA crucial issue in efficiency-equality evaluations of tax reforms resides in the possibility that the level as well as the distribution of welfare may change, where the household-specific measures of welfare capture the value of income as well as the value of leisure. A better-designed redistribution and income support system may not only foster equality but also improve the configuration of incentives and by this route contribute in its turn to efficiency. This paper presents an empirical analysis of the welfare effects for married couples of replacing the Italian tax system by three alternative hypothetical reforms: a flat tax, a negative income tax, and a work fare scheme. We employ a microeconometric model of household labour supply that represents partners’ simultaneous choices, allows for constraints in the choice of hours of work, and is sufficiently flexible to capture a large variety of supply responses. These features appear to be crucial in the evaluation of reform effects. The results suggest that there is scope for improving upon the current system under both the efficiency and the equality criterion. The benefits from the reforms, however, come from unexpected directions since the largest labour supply contribution to the increase in welfare come from poor and middle class households whereas rich households appear to be much less responsive to changes in the tax rates.The simulation results reveal that a crucial role in shaping the results is played by the relatively higher behavioural responsiveness of married women living in low and average income households.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDep. of Economics, Univ. of Oslo |cOsloen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aMemorandum, Department of Economics, University of Oslo |x2003,37en_US
dc.subject.jelD19en_US
dc.subject.jelD69en_US
dc.subject.jelJ22en_US
dc.subject.jelen_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordTax reformsen_US
dc.subject.keywordlabour supplyen_US
dc.subject.keywordwelfare gains and lossesen_US
dc.subject.keywordefficiency-equality trade-offen_US
dc.subject.keywordsocial welfareen_US
dc.subject.stwSteuerreformen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsangeboten_US
dc.subject.stwFinanzausgleichen_US
dc.subject.stwSoziale Wohlfahrtsfunktionen_US
dc.subject.stwItalienen_US
dc.titleDo more equal slices shrink the cake? An empirical investigation of tax-transfer reform proposals in Italyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn373620896en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
280.96 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.