Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62936
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrespi, Gustavoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCriscuolo, Chiaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaskel, Jonathanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T13:02:21Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T13:02:21Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/62936-
dc.description.abstractCase study evidence suggests that exporting firms learn from their clients. But econometric evidence, mostly using exporting and TFP growth, is mixed. We use a UK panel data set with firm-level information on exporting and productivity. Our innovation is that we also have direct data on the sources of learning (in this case about new technologies). Controlling for fixed effects we have two main findings. First, we find firms who exported in the past are more likely to then report that they learnt from buyers (relative to learning from other sources). Second, firms who had learned from buyers (more than they learnt from other sources) in the past are more likely to then have productivity growth. This suggests some support for the learning-by-exporting hypothesis, though is not clear whether firms deserve an exporting subsidy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aQueen Mary, Univ. of London, Dep. of Economics |cLondonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper, Department of Economics, Queen Mary, University of London |x559en_US
dc.subject.jelF12en_US
dc.subject.jelL1en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordProductivity, Exporting, Learningen_US
dc.titleProductivity, exporting and the learning-by-exporting hypothesis: Direct evidence from UK firmsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn511128568en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
308.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.