EconStor >
Queen Mary, University of London >
School of Economics and Finance, Queen Mary, University of London  >
Working Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance, Queen Mary, University of London  >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62813
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Christopher L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorQin, Duoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T12:59:11Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T12:59:11Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/62813-
dc.description.abstractWe characterize modern econometrics in terms of the emergence a widely accepted analytical framework. A major theme which dominated much of the debate through the century was whether and how econometric models can reflect theory-generated economic structures. In the period prior to the 2nd world war, economists adopted a wide variety of analytical methods, some ad hoc but others reflecting advances in statistical methodology. Business cycle analysis and demand analysis were the two major areas in which statistical theory was employed. Methods became increasingly formalized but problems of data adequacy, estimation and identification were not always well distinguished. During and immediately after the war, Cowles Commission research sought to base econometrics on autonomous probabilistic models specified in terms of underlying structural parameters. Least squares would not normally be consistent in such models and maximum likelihood estimation was to be preferred. Subsequently, however, the pendulum swung back towards least squares-based methods and this was reflected in the textbook expositions of what was accepted as standard econometrics in the late sixties and early seventies. Subsequently, the paradigm was undermined by the challenges imposed by rational expectations modelling, which challenged standard identification assumptions, and by the poor forecasting performance of many macroeconomic models by comparison with black box time series competitors. The result was a revival of non-structural modelling, particularly in the analysis of macroeconomic data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary, Univ. of London, Dep. of Economics Londonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper, Department of Economics, Queen Mary, University of London 544en_US
dc.subject.jelB16en_US
dc.subject.jelB23en_US
dc.subject.jelC10en_US
dc.subject.jelC50en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordEconometrics, History, Estimation, Identificationen_US
dc.subject.stwÖkonometrieen_US
dc.subject.stwMathematische Ökonomieen_US
dc.subject.stwDogmengeschichteen_US
dc.titleThe first fifty years of modern econometricsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn494382953en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance, Queen Mary, University of London

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
494382953.pdf406.97 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.