EconStor >
Brown University >
Department of Economics, Brown University >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Brown University >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62648
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Clippel, Geoffroyen_US
dc.contributor.authorEliaz, Kfiren_US
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Brianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-06en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-17T11:31:46Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-17T11:31:46Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/62648-
dc.description.abstractA key feature of arbitration is the possibility for conflicting parties to partake in the selection of the person who will rule the case. We analyze this problem of the selection of arbitrators from the perspective of implementation theory. Theoretical, empirical and experimental arguments are combined to highlight difficulties with a procedure that is commonly used in practice and to develop and identify better performing procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBrown Univ., Dep. of Economics Providence, RIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paper, Brown University, Department of Economics 2012-8en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleOn the selection of arbitratorsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn723933774en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, Brown University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
723933774_appendix.pdfAppendix156.38 kBAdobe PDF
723933774.pdf325.51 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.