EconStor >
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel >
Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers, IfW >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62347
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuncic, Aljazen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-16en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T11:50:47Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-13T11:50:47Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/62347-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines institutional determinants of bilateral trade in a thorough fashion, paying special attention to the issues of selecting institutional measures (using a new dataset), institutional endogeneity (cleansing the endogenous part) and state of the art gravity trade estimations (controlling for multilateral resistance). In terms of the institutional focus, we emphasize, as de Groot et al. (2004), that institutional distance can be an even more relevant determinant of trade than institutional quality on its own, but correct for the technical and substance shortcomings of the afore mentioned paper. We find that not all institutions matter for trade. The consistent effect is that of the quality of origin and destination country's legal institutions, which both increase trade. In terms of political and economic institutions, only the quality of origin's political institutions and destination's economic institutions increase trade, the latter being most salient. More importantly, we highlight the importance of the effect of institutional distance on trade, showing that economic distance affects trade significantly and negatively, an effect practically impossible to dissipate in any specification. Our conclusion in this research is that countries which are more similar in terms of economic institutions, trade more with each other, and that the quality of legal institutions is always conducive to general trade, but surprisingly does not determine your trade partners. Finally, we show that the use of only one of the proxies generally used by the literature to control for institutional environment can be biased and misleading in terms of what is actually being controlled for.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kielen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKiel advanced studies Working Papers 462en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleInstitutional determinants of bilateral trade: Taking another looken_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn721348688en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers, IfW
Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des IfW

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
721348688.pdf127.92 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.