EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
Sonderforschungsbereich 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
Discussion Papers, SFB 373, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62257
  
Title:Neoclassical convergence versus technological catch-up: A contribution for reaching a consensus PDF Logo
Authors:Desdoigts, Alain
Issue Date:2000
Series/Report no.:Discussion Papers, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes 2000,42
Abstract:New macro empirical evidence is provided to assess the relative importance of object and idea gaps in explaining the world income distribution dynamics. Formal statistical hypothesis tests allow us to discriminate between two competing growthmodels: (i) the standard neoclassical growth model similar to that employed by Mankiw, Romer, and Weil (1992), (ii) an extension of the Nelson and Phelps' approach (1966) that emphasizes the importance of technology transfer in addition to factors accumulation. First, the latter model better characterizes international data at an aggregate level. It cannot be rejected as a null hypothesis and is significantly preferred to a standard neoclassical model. Second, robust to sample selection evidence suggests that the high social returns to investment in equipment (as opposed to structure) reflect technology transfer mediated through capital goods. Finally, technological catch-up mostly benefits socially advanced economies and largely contributes to the polarization of the world income distribution.
Subjects:economic growth
neoclassical convergence
technological catch-up
income dynamics
JEL:C12
C14
C21
O33
O40
O50
Persistent Identifier of the first edition:urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-10047541
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Discussion Papers, SFB 373, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
723759073.pdf1.35 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/62257

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.