|
EconStor >
Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen >
Ruhr Economic Papers, RWI >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/61670
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Paloyo, Alfredo R. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-08-28 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-08-30T13:44:52Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2012-08-30T13:44:52Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2011 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | | 978-3-86788-345-0 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/61670 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | Using digitized texts scanned by Google and subjected to optical character recognition, I show that heteroskedasticity overtook heteroscedasticity as the preferred spelling in 2001 and has continued to dominate, except for 2005, up to 2008. The latest trends indicate that writers are moving toward the k variant. However, for words such as homoskedasticity, heteroskedastic, and homoskedastic, the corresponding spellings using c are still overwhelmingly dominant, albeit slowly shifting. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | RWI Essen | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Ruhr Economic Papers 300 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | A20 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | B19 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | B29 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Heteroskedasticity | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Culturomics | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Google Books | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | econometric orthography | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | philology | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Heteroskedasticity | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Culturomics | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Google Books | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | econometric orthography | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | philology | | en_US |
| dc.title | | When did we begin to spell heteros*edasticity correctly? | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 722374615 | | en_US |
| dc.description.abstracttrans | | Unter Verwendung von Texten, die durch Google digitalisiert und einem Texterkennungsprogramm unterzogen wurden, zeige ich, dass sich heteroskedasticity gegenüber heteroscedasticity 2001 als bevorzugte Schreibweise durchsetzte und, mit Ausnahme von 2005, bis 2008 weiterhin vorgeherrscht hat. Die aktuellen Entwicklungen deuten darauf hin, dass Verfasser vermehrt die k-Schreibweise verwenden. Allerdings ist für Wörter wie homoskedasticity, heteroskedastic und homoskedastic die Schreibweise mit c immer noch deutlich stärker verbreitet, wenngleich auch hier ein langsamer Wandel stattfindet. | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | | Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des RWI Ruhr Economic Papers, RWI
|
| Files in This Item:
| |
|
| No. of Downloads:
| |
| last Month |
last 3 Month |
total |
|
|
|
|
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|