Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/60557 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
Staff Report No. 210
Publisher: 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, NY
Abstract: 
In this paper, we address the question whether increasing households' financial market access improves welfare in a financial system in which there is intense competition among banks for private households' funds. Following earlier work by Diamond and by Fecht, we use a model in which the degree of liquidity insurance offered to households through banks' deposit contracts is restrained by households' financial market access. However, we also assume spatial monopolistic competition among banks. Because monopoly rents are assumed to bring about inefficiencies, improved financial market access that limits monopoly rents also entails a positive effect; however, this beneficial effect is only relevant if competition among banks does not sufficiently restrain monopoly rents already. Thus, our results suggest that in Germany's bank-dominated financial system, which is characterized by intense competition for households' deposits, improved financial market access might reduce welfare because it only reduces risk sharing. In contrast, in the U.S. banking system, where there is less competition for households' deposits, a high level of household financial market participation might be beneficial.
Subjects: 
financial intermediaries
risk sharing
banking competition
comparing financial systems
JEL: 
E44
G10
G21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
464.17 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.