EconStor >
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel >
Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal - Discussion Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60492
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBholat, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorGray, Joannen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-16T17:21:35Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-16T17:21:35Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/60492-
dc.description.abstractSystemic risk now occupies centre stage in discussions of bank regulatory reform. Systemic risk is often seen as a problem of size, operational complexity, interconnectivity and contagion. It is less often discussed in terms of the institutional framework of legal rules and principles within which financial intermediation takes place, and the organizational culture promoted by those structures. In this article we redress this deficit through an appraisal of Northern Rock, illustrating the consequences of its transformation from mutually owned building society to publicly held company on organisational culture. These changes had profound effects on the incentive structure of its owners and managers, as profit-maximisation and shareholder value became the driving forces within the firm, as in much of the rest of the UK banking sector. Thus, in addition to grappling with risk and uncertainty - and taking care to distinguish between the two - current efforts to construct a new macro-prudential regulatory paradigm should recognize the importance of Frank Knight's third key conceptual category-profit. Furthermore, in seeking to understand systemic risk, it becomes necessary to delve into micro-legal concepts such as property, trust, and contract that govern different forms of business to discern whether or not some modes of financial association create a greater degree of systemic risk than others. This is especially so when one organizational model comes to dominate retail markets, as did the publicly held company in the UK banking sector at the turn of the twenty-first century.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kielen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEconomics Discussion Papers 2012-35en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordNorthern Rocken_US
dc.subject.keywordsystemic risken_US
dc.subject.keywordbanksen_US
dc.subject.keywordbuilding societiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordUK residential mortgagesen_US
dc.subject.stwSubprime-Hypotheken_US
dc.subject.stwFinanzmarktkriseen_US
dc.subject.stwBanken_US
dc.subject.stwUnternehmenskulturen_US
dc.subject.stwBankrisikoen_US
dc.subject.stwSystemrisikoen_US
dc.subject.stwGroßbritannienen_US
dc.titleOrganizational form as a source of systemic risken_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn720845203en_US
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/de/deed.enen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ifwedp:201235-
Appears in Collections:Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal - Discussion Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
720845203.pdf483.86 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.