Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60408
Authors: 
Dyzenhaus, David
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
WZB Discussion Paper SP IV 2011-802
Abstract: 
I argue that legal and constitutional theory should avoid the idea of constituent power. It is unhelpful in seeking to understand the authority of law and the place of written constitutions in such an understanding. In particular, it results in a deep ambivalence about whether authority is located within or without the legal order. That ambivalence also manifests itself within positivist legal theory, which explains the affinity between theories of constituent power and legal positivist accounts of authority. Legal theory should then focus on the question of law's authority as one entirely internal to legal order, thus making the question of constituent power superfluous.
Subjects: 
legal theory
constitutional theory
constituent power
positivist legal theory
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
349.7 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.