Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Katja Lindskoven_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-19T15:10:26Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-19T15:10:26Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-87-7605-503-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/59833-
dc.description.abstractBiometric technology has been afforded a central role in the security architecture that Western governments have forged since the events of 9/11 2001. With biometrics the body becomes the anchor of identification. In a security architecture centred on identification of persons of interest and determination of their status as friend or foe, biometrics has come to be praised for its supposedly exceptional capacity to identify reliably. This report situates the use of biometrics as a security technology in relation to this promise of superior identification on the one hand and, on the other, to the various concerns that critics have raised. It argues that it is vital that decision makers acknowledge how biometrics is neither a flawless nor a politically neutral technology. Unless caution and concerns are taken seriously the risk is that biometrics will produce new forms of insecurity - rather than increased security.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDanish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) |cCopenhagenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDIIS Reports / Danish Institute for International Studies |x2012:07en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleBiometrics as security technology: Expansion amidst fallibilityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn717892476en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
235.08 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.