EconStor >
Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy (RJFP) >
Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59807
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBodislav, Alexandruen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-20en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-19T10:28:36Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-19T10:28:36Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationRomanian Journal of Fiscal Policy (RJFP) 2069-0983 3 2012 1 9-19en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/59807-
dc.description.abstractThe economies of developed countries of the 21st century benefit from the unseen-till-now prosperity; life standard that suffered a hard landing starting with 2007 and that seems to evolve in a chain-saw model for the crisis development. The forecast is based on the first in, last out” principle; first in the US, last out the emergent countries that are under the contagion process and under inefficient governance and which started as a subprime crisis and continues as a deficit crisis. These nations produced one of the highest life standards in history. How was this possible? It is believed that the origin of this prosperity (before and after the crisis) is in the development of an economic system that embraces the free enterprise, capitalism and competition because prosperity represents is the crossroad between the self interests of many. This research paper tries to underline the factors that led to the actual development of the crisis; from the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers to the unstable and not well directed actions of governments around the world and to these first tier layers there are added the second tier layers that include the political vantage point that influences the paths that are followed for limiting the negative aspects of the economic crisis and to improve new opportunities that appear as a result of openness and collaboration. The muddling through principle was adopted by the Obama Administration and this fact is one of the main factors that ease the deployment of near future economic improvement for the United States, but for the long run this isn't a solution to develop a healthy economy and create sustainable economic growth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.subject.jelE32en_US
dc.subject.jelE63en_US
dc.subject.jelO16en_US
dc.subject.jelO47en_US
dc.subject.jelP12en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordcapitalismen_US
dc.subject.keyworddeficit crisisen_US
dc.subject.keywordeconomic crisisen_US
dc.subject.keywordglobal synchronismen_US
dc.subject.keywordPIIGSBen_US
dc.titleHow did we get to the deficit spectrum of the economic crisis?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn717989879en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/-
Appears in Collections:Romanian Journal of Fiscal Policy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
717989879.pdf735.5 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.