EconStor >
Universität zu Köln >
Seminar für Unternehmensführung und Logistik, Universität Köln >
Working Paper Series, Seminar für Unternehmensführung und Logistik, Universität Köln >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59784
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReihlen, Markusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-26en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-18T16:34:56Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-18T16:34:56Z-
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/59784-
dc.description.abstractAn increasing number of firms are moving into a new form of competition which can be described as knowledge-based competition. Firms in knowledge-based rivalry are competing mostly on their learning capabilities. The relative importance of capital and labor as a key input factor in the production process is diminishing in favor of knowledge. Accordingly, firms in knowledge-based competition can be labeled as knowledge-intensive in contrast to capital- or labor-intensive firms (Starbuck, 1992). However, in deciding whether a firm really can be characterized as knowledge-intensive, it has to create unique expertise instead of widely shared public knowledge. Knowledge-intensive firms actively choose the terrain on which to compete. They do not seek to maximize profits simply by minimizing costs, but pursue competitive advantage on the basis of innovation in products, processes, and organization. Superior competitive positions and high monopolistic rents are a result of firm's learning abilities that allow faster and more valuable knowledge creation for problem-solving than competitors (Best, 1990). The credo of knowledge-based competition is, as TOM PETERS (1990) puts it: "Get innovative or get dead." This paper focuses on how knowledge-intensive firms should organize its operations which depend highly on innovative problem-solving. After a quick review and critical discussion of some organizational principles which were put forward by the traditional management literature, a new organizational model will be proposed for mastering the challenges of the new competition. In contrast to the rigid hierarchy, a flexible self-governed organizational form will be suggested that is labeled as heterarchy. The basic idea and underlying assumptions will be summarized. In addition, some leverages for managing heterarchies will be outlined.en
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv., Seminar für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Betriebswirtschaftliche Planung und Logistik Kölnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesArbeitsberichte des Seminars für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Betriebswirtschaftliche Planung und Logistik der Universität zu Köln 91en_US
dc.subject.ddc650en_US
dc.titleThe logic of heterarchies: Making organizations competitive for knowledge-based competitionen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn71823040Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ucdbpl:91-
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series, Seminar für Unternehmensführung und Logistik, Universität Köln

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
71823040X.pdf57.84 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.