Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59706
Authors: 
Athanassoglou, Stergios
Bosetti, Valentina
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Nota di lavoro, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: Climate Change and Sustainable Development 04.2012
Abstract: 
Optimal R&D investment is defined by deep uncertainty that can only partially be addressed through historical data. Thus, expert judgments expressed as subjective probability distributions are seen as an alternative way of assessing the potential of new technologies. In this paper we propose a simple decision-theoretic framework that takes into account ambiguity over expert opinion and helps decision makers visualize the full range of R&D outcomes given a particular level of ambiguity. Our model is intuitive, captures decision makers' ambiguity attitudes, and enables simple sensitivity analysis across levels of ambiguity. We apply our framework to original data from a recent expert elicitation survey on solar technology. The analysis suggests that ambiguity plays an important role in assessing the potential of a breakthrough in solar technology given different R&D investments.
Subjects: 
Ambiguity
Expert Elicitation
Convex Optimization
Solar Energy
JEL: 
C61
D81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
2.01 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.