Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/59682 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2010
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 1505
Publisher: 
Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Evanston, IL
Abstract: 
In a product choice game played between a long lived seller and an infinite sequence of buyers, we assume that buyers cannot observe past signals. To facilitate the analysis of applications such as online auctions (e.g. eBay), online shopping search engines (e.g. BizRate.com) and consumer reports, we assume that a central mechanism observes all past signals, and makes public announcements every period. The set of announcements and the mapping from observed signals to the set of announcements is called a rating system. We show that, absent reputation effects, information censoring cannot improve attainable payoffs. However, if there is an initial probability that the seller is a commitment type that plays a particular strategy every period, then there exists a finite rating system and an equilibrium of the resulting game such that, the expected present discounted payoff of the seller is almost his Stackelberg payoff after every history. This is in contrast to Cripps, Mailath and Samuelson (2004), where it is shown that reputation effects do not last forever in such games if buyers can observe all past signals. We also construct finite rating systems that increase payoffs of almost all buyers, while decreasing the seller's payoff.
Subjects: 
Reputations
Rating Systems
Online Reputation Mechanisms
Disappearing Reputations
Permanent Reputations
JEL: 
D82
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
262.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.