|
EconStor >
Northwestern University >
Kellogg School of Management - Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University >
Discussion Papers, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59629
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Al-Najjar, Nabil I. | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | De Castro, Luciano I. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2011-08-04 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2012-07-12T12:33:38Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2012-07-12T12:33:38Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2010 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59629 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | This note questions the behavioral content of second-order acts and their use in decision theoretic models. We show that there can be no verification mechanism to determine what the decision maker receives under a second-order act. This impossibility applies even in idealized repeated experiments where infinite data can be observed. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Northwestern Univ., Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science Evanston | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Discussion Paper, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science 1531 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Observability and "second-order acts" | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 665455933 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | | Discussion Papers, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|