Northwestern University >
Kellogg School of Management - Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University >
Discussion Papers, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
| || |
|Title:||Tougher educational exam leading to worse selection |
|Authors:||de Carvalho Andrade, Eduardo|
De Castro, Luciano I.
|Issue Date:||2011 |
|Series/Report no.:||Discussion Paper, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science 1533|
|Abstract:||A parallel of education with transformative processes in standard markets suggest that a more severe control of the quality of the output will improve the overall quality of the education. This paper shows a somehow counterintuitive result: an increase in the exam difficulty may reduce the average quality (productivity) of selected individuals. Since the exam does not verify all skills, when its standard rises, candidates with relatively low skills emphasized in the test and high skills demanded in the job may no longer qualify. Hence, an increase in the testing standard may be counterproductive. One implication is that policies should emphasize alignment between the skills tested and those required in the actual jobs, rather than increase exams' difficulties.|
|Document Type:||Working Paper|
|Appears in Collections:||Discussion Papers, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University|
Download bibliographical data as:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.