EconStor >
Universität Passau >
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Passau >
Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe, Universität Passau >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59603
  
Title:Deeds rather than omissions: How intended consequences provoke negative reciprocity PDF Logo
Authors:Schubert, Manuel
Issue Date:2012
Series/Report no.:Passauer Diskussionspapiere: Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe V-65-12
Abstract:Intention-based models of reciprocity argue that people assess kindness by measuring the intended consequences of actual behavior (deeds) against foregone payoffs resulting from unchosen alternatives (omissions). While the effects of omissions have been intensively studied in recent years, less has been done with respect to the impact of deeds on reciprocation. I employ a novel game that alters the intended consequences behind actual behavior at constant levels of unchosen alternatives and realized payoffs. Aggregate results suggest that intended consequences only weakly matter for negative reciprocity. I find men to abstain from retaliation when others intend to mildly harm them. Women, however, seem to be largely invariant to intended consequences of actual behavior.
Subjects:intentions
reciprocity
kindness
gender
JEL:D63
C78
C91
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe, Universität Passau

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
71905687X.pdf190.33 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59603

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.