Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59478
Authors: 
Hughes, Joseph P.
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey 2011,29
Abstract: 
Cost functions and cost efficiency are commonly estimated for industries with detailed data on production and cost, both for firms that are for profit as well as not for profit. The data on not-for-profits obtained from the IRS Form 990 lack these details and, consequently, encourage substitution of the ratio of program expenses to total expenses to gauge performance. While a larger program expense ratio captures better administrative cost efficiency, it does not gauge best-practice cost and the extent to which an organization's administrative costs exceed best practice. Using the Form 990 data, this study constructs an administrative cost function for not-for-profits and uses the distribution-free technique of estimating a best-practice cost frontier to gauge the relative efficiency of not-for-profit organizations. Focusing on not-for-profit hospitals and their holdings of liquid assets, the empirical evidence is consistent with Jensen's free cash flow hypothesis: hospitals holding liquid assets in excess of a benchmark have lower program expense ratios and lower cost efficiency. In addition, the CEOs of more cost efficient hospitals earn higher compensation. The agreement of the evidence on agency problems related to excess holdings of liquid assets from the program expense ratio and administrative cost efficiency reinforce the credibility of the latter as a measure of the performance of not-for-profit organizations.
Subjects: 
not-for-profit
cost efficiency
free cash flow hypothesis
JEL: 
D24
D22
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
134.83 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.