EconStor >
University of California (UC) >
UC Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development (IURD) >
Working Papers, IURD, UC Berkeley >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59393
  
Title:Network governance and regional equity: Shared agendas or problematic partners? PDF Logo
Authors:Reckhow, Sarah
Lester, T. William
Issue Date:2007
Series/Report no.:Working Paper, Institute of Urban and Regional Development 2007,10
Abstract:The new economic reality of heightened international competition, constant technological change, and cross border migration flowsreferred to in shorthand as globalization”has upset traditional forms of governing capitalist economies. Nation-states were once considered the only appropriate scale to create socialist planned economies or establish the institutions that guide freemarket exchange. Today, many political scientists and sociologists argue that the sovereignty of national governments is either greatly diminished (Jessop 1994; Ohmae 1995; Peck 1994) or drastically restructured by networked” forms of social exchange that ignore political boundaries (Castells 1996). Economic geographers and regional economists argue that globalization has ushered in a new form of competition through which the competitive advantage of firms is set by actors and institutions that operate at a regional or metropolitan scale (Sabel 1989; Storper 1997). Ultimately, there is an emerging consensus in the academic literature as well as policy discourse that the metropolitan scale is a key level of economic exchange.
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, IURD, UC Berkeley

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
592535665.pdf531.23 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59393

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.