Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/59164
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Geoffreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuinnane, Timothy W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-20T13:15:10Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-20T13:15:10Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/59164-
dc.description.abstractSimon Szreter's book Fertility, Class, and Gender in Britain, 1860-1940 argues that social and economic class fails to explain the cross-sectional differences in marital fertility asreported in the 1911 census of England and Wales. Szreter's conclusion made the book immediately influential, and it remains so. This finding matters a great deal for debates about the causes of the European fertility decline of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. For decades scholars have argued whether the main forces at work were ideational or social and economic. This note reports a simple re-analysis of Szreter's own data, which suggests that social class does explain cross-sectional differences in English marital fertility in 1911.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aYale Univ., Economic Growth Center |cNew Haven, Conn.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCenter Discussion Paper, Economic Growth Center |x993en_US
dc.subject.jelJ13en_US
dc.subject.jelN33en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordFertility transitionen_US
dc.subject.keyword1911 Census of England and Walesen_US
dc.titleSocial class and the fertility transition: A critical comment on the statistical results reported in Simon Szreter's fertility, class and gender in Britain, 1986-1940en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn641309996en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
114.77 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.