EconStor >
University of California (UC) >
UC Davis, Department of Economics >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, UC Davis >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Burkhard C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401-
dc.description.abstractContrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDep. of Economics, Univ. of California Davis, Calif.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers, University of California, Department of Economics 09,17en_US
dc.subject.jelA12en_US
dc.subject.jelB41en_US
dc.subject.jelC80en_US
dc.subject.jelC90en_US
dc.subject.jelD60en_US
dc.subject.jelD80en_US
dc.subject.jelD87en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordrevealed preferenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordtheory of choiceen_US
dc.subject.keywordneuroeconomicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordnon-choice evidenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordmachinesen_US
dc.titleHow mindless is standard economics really?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn612514102en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, UC Davis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
612514102.pdf153.78 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.