EconStor >
University of California (UC) >
UC Davis, Department of Economics >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, UC Davis >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58361
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Burkharden_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-12T13:33:25Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-12T13:33:25Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58361-
dc.description.abstractWe correlate choice under risk in Holt-Laury lottery tasks for gains and losses with salivary testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, and cortisol, the use of hormonal contraceptives, menstrual cycle information as well as the digit ratio (2D:4D) in more than 200 subjects. Risk aversion is negatively correlated with testosterone and positively correlated with cortisol, a stress hormone, for gains only. In males, testosterone is negatively correlated with risk aversion for gains only. In females, cortisol is marginally significantly positively correlated with risk aversion for gains only. No other significant correlations between risk aversion and salivary hormones are observed. In females, testosterone and progesterone are positively correlated with reflection, i.e., risk aversion for gains and risk seeking for losses. Testosterone is negatively correlated with consistency of preferences in females, while estradiol is negatively correlated with consistency of preferences in males. No significant correlations between risk aversion and the menstrual cycle or the digit ratio are observed. Females on hormonal contraceptives are more likely to make consistent choices although this may be due to a selection effect. Risk aversion is positively correlated with being female for losses only. Yet, if we control for salivary hormones we are surprised to find a negative correlation between female and risk aversion for gains.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDep. of Economics, Univ. of California Davis, Calif.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers, University of California, Department of Economics 12,7en_US
dc.subject.jelC91en_US
dc.subject.jelC92en_US
dc.subject.jelD44en_US
dc.subject.jelD81en_US
dc.subject.jelD87en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordHormonesen_US
dc.subject.keywordMenstrual cycleen_US
dc.subject.keywordContraceptionen_US
dc.subject.keywordDigit ratioen_US
dc.subject.keyword2D:4Den_US
dc.subject.keywordGenderen_US
dc.subject.keywordRisk behavioren_US
dc.subject.keywordEndocrinological economicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordHolt-Lauryen_US
dc.subject.keywordRisk aversionen_US
dc.subject.keywordRisk seekingen_US
dc.subject.keywordReflection effecten_US
dc.subject.keywordProspect theoryen_US
dc.titleSex hormones and choice under risken_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn717283895en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, UC Davis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
717283895.pdf5.37 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.