Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57983
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Korneliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKleinlein, Axelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-13en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-22T15:49:16Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-22T15:49:16Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citation|aDIW Economic Bulletin |c2192-7219 |v2 |y2012 |h2 |p3-13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57983-
dc.description.abstractSince their introduction, the Riester pension scheme and the individual Riester products have become less beneficial to savers. Contracts concluded today will often lead to lower returns compared to contracts concluded in 2001. From a social perspective, meaning pension benefits in relation to individual saving contributions plus state subsidy, overall returns on all insurance-based products are very low. This is due to the general decline in returns on the capital market and, in particular, to a series of government-mandated certification and calculation rules. Urgently needed structural reforms include the abolition of exchange costs, standardized cost information, certification with regards to content instead of formal certification and the regulation of calculation methods. In addition, limiting the number of products is also recommended. Given the shortcomings of the Riester system, there is good reason to fundamentally rethink old-age pension provision policy. In doing so, a targeted reduction or even elimination of extra public funding ought not to be taboo. The tax saved could be used to strengthen the pay-as-you-go state pension scheme.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aDeutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) |cBerlinen_US
dc.subject.jelD18en_US
dc.subject.jelD82en_US
dc.subject.jelD91en_US
dc.subject.jelE21en_US
dc.subject.jelH55en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordprivate pension provisionen_US
dc.subject.keywordRiester schemeen_US
dc.subject.keywordfunding principleen_US
dc.subject.keywordwelfare stateen_US
dc.titleTen years of the Riester pension scheme: No reason to celebrateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn685180115en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
129.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.