|
EconStor >
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin >
DIW Economic Bulletin >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57708
|
| | |
| Title: | | Child care choices in Western Germany also correlated with mother's personality  |
| Authors: | | Bjerre, Liv Peter, Frauke H. Spieß, C. Katharina |
| Issue Date: | | 2011 |
| Citation: | | [Journal:] DIW Economic Bulletin [ISSN:] 2192-7219 [Volume:] 1 [Year:] 2011 [Issue:] 5 [Pages:] 20-26 |
| Abstract: | | The expansion of formal child care, particularly for children under the age of three, has resulted in more and more children from this age group attending day care facilities. This formal child care setting is frequently combined with care provided by grandparents or other individuals. The combination and number of child care settings made use of is influenced by a variety of socio-economic factors and the range of options available. Maternal personality can also explain differences in child care choices, if only to a relatively limited extent and predominantly in families residing in western Germany. Analyses based on the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) show that mothers in western Germany who are very open to new experiences are more likely to combine the use of formal with informal child care. Mothers, who classify themselves as conscientious, in line with personality research, are less likely to use this setting as the sole additional type of child care alongside parental care. The analyses emphasize just how different parental preferences are. A policy that is focused on freedom of choice and on creating the conditions for this by expanding the child care infrastructure should take these differences into account. |
| Subjects: | | child care personality factors maternal employment |
| JEL: | | J13 J22 |
| Document Type: | | Article |
| Appears in Collections: | | Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des DIW DIW Economic Bulletin
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57708
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|