EconStor >
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta >
Economic Review (Vol. 93-95), Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57665
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWall, Larry D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReichert, Alan K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Hsin-yuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-30T12:31:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-30T12:31:04Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 0732-1813 93 2008 1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57665-
dc.description.abstractThe policy debate on whether to strengthen or to remove the legal barriers between banking and commerce has paid little attention to what the practical effects of removing the barriers would be. To help answer this question, this article, the first part of a two-part study, provides an overview of the potential gains of integrating banking and commerce. Economic theory, the authors note, suggests that joint corporate ownership of banks and commercial firms has several potential benefits, including economies of scale and scope, increased internal capital markets, and diversification. Commercial firms could also enjoy a significant reduction in funding costs if affiliation with a bank extended the federal safety net for banks to cover the commercial firms' liabilities. But some benefits are already available without common ownership. Moreover, common ownership may also result in some disadvantages, such as significant diseconomies of scale and scope. Actual experience provides better insight than theory can about the relative magnitudes of the benefits and costs of cross-industry combinations. U.S. experience with limited openings between banking and nonbank activities suggests that the most common combinations were banks with nonbank financial firms, relationships that were authorized by a 1999 reform act. Foreign experience and U.S. conglomerates of nonbank firms in different industries fail to provide compelling evidence for large-scale combinations of banking and commercial firms.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFederal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Atlanta, GAen_US
dc.subject.jelG21en_US
dc.subject.jelG34en_US
dc.subject.jelG28en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordbanking and commerceen_US
dc.subject.stwBanken_US
dc.subject.stwHandelen_US
dc.subject.stwBankrechten_US
dc.subject.stwDeregulierungen_US
dc.subject.stwKosten-Nutzen-Analyseen_US
dc.subject.stwSkalenertragen_US
dc.subject.stwVerbundvorteilen_US
dc.subject.stwUSAen_US
dc.titleThe Final Frontier: The Integration of Banking and Commerce. Part 1: The Likely Outcome of Eliminating the Barrieren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn602144191en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Economic Review (Vol. 93-95), Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
602144191.pdf357.65 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.