EconStor >
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta >
Economic Review (Vol. 93-95), Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57662
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReichert, Alan K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWall, Larry D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Hsin-yuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-30T12:30:58Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-30T12:30:58Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 0732-1813 93 2008 2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/57662-
dc.description.abstractIn the first part (in the previous issue of Economic Review) of this two-part study, the authors identified a number of possible benefits from combining banking and commerce, including portfolio diversification, the creation of internal capital markets, and economies of scale and scope. This second part of the study analyzes the one source of possible gainsportfolio diversificationthat can be estimated with existing data. Using methodologies from previous studies, the authors combine ten financial and nonfinancial industries into hypothetical portfolios using industry-level profitability data calculated from corporate tax returns filed with the Internal Revenue Service between 1994 and 2004. The analysis demonstrates that pairwise combinations of banks with construction firms or with retail firms would have produced substantially higher returns on equity with less risk during the sample period. Efficient portfolios combining banks with several other industries showed even higher levels of returns relative to risk, although banks were not necessarily a dominant part of some combinations. These findings suggest that portfolio diversification could be an important benefit from combining banks with some types of nonbank firms. The authors stress that bank management contemplating diversification into the commercial sector must be selective about which specific industries they choose, while corporate management interested in moving into banking might need to settle for somewhat lower returns to achieve a substantial reduction in risk.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFederal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Atlanta, GAen_US
dc.subject.jelG21en_US
dc.subject.jelG34en_US
dc.subject.jelG28en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordbanking and commerceen_US
dc.subject.keywordportfolio diversificationen_US
dc.subject.stwBanken_US
dc.subject.stwHandelen_US
dc.subject.stwBankrechten_US
dc.subject.stwDeregulierungen_US
dc.subject.stwDiversifikationen_US
dc.subject.stwRentabilit├Ąten_US
dc.subject.stwUSAen_US
dc.titleThe Final Frontier: The Integration of Banking and Commerce. Part 2: Risk and Return Using Efficient Portfolio Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ppn602145120en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US
Appears in Collections:Economic Review (Vol. 93-95), Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
602145120.pdf313.52 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.